Quadro FX 3700M vs GeForce 710M
Quadro FX 3700M
Popular choices:
GeForce 710M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700M is positioned at rank 357 and the GeForce 710M is on rank 306, so the GeForce 710M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 710M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 710M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 710M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3700M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 710M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700M and GeForce 710M
Quadro FX 3700M
The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 710M
The GeForce 710M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 448 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 and the GeForce 710M reaches 448 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 710M uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 384 (GeForce 710M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 710M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 451 | 448 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.9032 TFLOPS+45% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3700M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 710M has 2 GB. The GeForce 710M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 710M) — the GeForce 710M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 11.0 (GeForce 710M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (Quadro FX 3700M) vs No (GeForce 710M). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 710M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP2 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the GeForce 710M's 33W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 710M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 350W (GeForce 710M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | GeForce 710M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 33W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 13.6+467% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3700M and GeForce 710M
