Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 8500M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 8500M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 8500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3700M
2008Why buy it
- ✅23.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌372.5% higher power demand at 189W vs 40W.
Radeon HD 8500M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 189W, a 149W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 8500M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3700M
The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8500M
The Radeon HD 8500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 447 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 and the Radeon HD 8500M reaches 447 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8500M uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8500M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 8500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 451 | 447 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 640+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.864 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 8500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3700M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8500M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3700M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700M and System on the Radeon HD 8500M.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 8500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 11.1 (11_0) (Radeon HD 8500M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 8500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon HD 8500M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 8500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP2 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8500M's 40W — a 130.1% difference. The Radeon HD 8500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 8500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 40W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 11.2+367% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















