Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Quadro FX 3700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Quadro FX 3700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Quadro FX 3700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

2009

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale (2005−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 3700M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (463 vs 451), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2009 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs Quadro FX 3700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4670

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 463 points.

Quadro FX 3700M

The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 scores 463 and the Quadro FX 3700M reaches 451 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 3700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3700M). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
G3D Mark Score	463+3%	451
Architecture	TeraScale	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS+41%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700M.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
DirectX	10.1	11 (10_0)+9%
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs No (Quadro FX 3700M). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	UVD 2.2	PureVideo VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 3700M's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4670) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
TDP	30W-84%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	15.4+542%	2.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 4670 (2009 vs 2008).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4670	Quadro FX 3700M
MSRP	$67	—
Codename	M98	GT200B
Release	January 9 2009	November 11 2008
Ranking	#927	#815

Search Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.