Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7560D

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7560D

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7560D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7560D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7560D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3700M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7560D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $101 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7560D

2012

Why buy it

  • 13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($101 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7560D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (452 vs 451), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3700M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7560D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7560D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3700M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7560D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700M

The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 7560D

The Radeon HD 7560D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 452 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 and the Radeon HD 7560D reaches 452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7560D uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7560D). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7560D).

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
G3D Mark Score
451
452
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1792+647%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+361%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
112+40%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3700M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7560D carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3700M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3700M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7560D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7560D) — the Radeon HD 7560D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7560D). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
DirectX
11 (10_0)
11.2 (11_0)+2%
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (Quadro FX 3700M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7560D). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7560D).

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo VP2
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7560D's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7560D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
2.4+4%
2.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7560D (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MRadeon HD 7560D
MSRP
$101
Codename
GT200B
Tahiti
Release
November 11 2008
January 31 2012
Ranking
#815
#454

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.