
Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7560D

Quadro FX 3700M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7560D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700M is positioned at rank 357 and the Radeon HD 7560D is on rank 244, so the Radeon HD 7560D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7560D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7560D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3700M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7560D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700M and Radeon HD 7560D

Quadro FX 3700M
The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 7560D
The Radeon HD 7560D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 452 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 and the Radeon HD 7560D reaches 452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7560D uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7560D). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7560D).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 451 | 452 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1792+647% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+361% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3700M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7560D has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 3700M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7560D) — the Radeon HD 7560D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7560D). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0)+2% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (Quadro FX 3700M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7560D). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon HD 7560D).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP2 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7560D's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7560D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-6% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4+4% | 2.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7560D is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700M | Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $101 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | GT200B | Tahiti |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #815 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















