Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon HD 7640G

Quadro FX 3700M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Radeon HD 7640G

2012Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 3700M

189

451

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon HD 7640G

454

+0.7%

Radeon HD 8470

Radeon HD 2900 GT

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700M is positioned at rank 357 and the Radeon HD 7640G is on rank 380, so the Quadro FX 3700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700M

#342

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

16414%

#357

Quadro FX 3700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

100%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

99%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

98%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

98%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

96%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

90%

#365

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

89%

#366

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

89%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

88%

#368

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

87%

#369

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

87%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

79%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

76%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G

#370

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1196%

#372

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1084%

#373

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1081%

#377

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

983%

#378

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

976%

#380

Radeon HD 7640G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

100%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

97%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

96%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

96%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

95%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

95%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

94%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

94%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

93%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

93%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7640G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3700M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 3700M	Radeon HD 7640G
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7640G remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3700M Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 7640G Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700M and Radeon HD 7640G

Quadro FX 3700M

The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 7640G

The Radeon HD 7640G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 454 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 and the Radeon HD 7640G reaches 454 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7640G uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7640G). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7640G).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Radeon HD 7640G
G3D Mark Score	451	454
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+8%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Radeon HD 7640G
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3700M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7640G has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 3700M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Radeon HD 7640G
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 11 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7640G). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Radeon HD 7640G
DirectX	11 (10_0)	11 (11_0)
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (Quadro FX 3700M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7640G). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 7640G).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Radeon HD 7640G
Encoder	No	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP2	UVD 3.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7640G's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.