Quadro FX 3700M
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro FX 3700M vs GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 3700M
189
451
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 415
brand logoGeForce 610M
brand logoGeForce 7950 GT
brand logoGeForce GT 330
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 2060
160
14,114
+3029.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Black
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 3700M is positioned at rank #357 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700M

#342
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
16414%
#357
Quadro FX 3700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
99%
#360
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
98%
#361
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
98%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
96%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
90%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
89%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
89%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
88%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
87%
#369
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
87%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
79%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
76%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3700M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3029.5% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (6 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3700M.

InsightQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-3029.5%)
✅Leading raw performance (+3029.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
—
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3700M Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low20 FPS
medium16 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1440p
low15 FPS
medium12 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra8 FPS
4K
low10 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low136 FPS
medium110 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra96 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS
medium90 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra73 FPS
4K
low63 FPS
medium50 FPS
high43 FPS
ultra34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low20 FPS
medium16 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1440p
low15 FPS
medium12 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra8 FPS
4K
low10 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low347 FPS
medium329 FPS
high231 FPS
ultra190 FPS
1440p
low218 FPS
medium202 FPS
high152 FPS
ultra124 FPS
4K
low104 FPS
medium94 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low20 FPS
medium16 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1440p
low15 FPS
medium12 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra8 FPS
4K
low10 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low635 FPS
medium508 FPS
high423 FPS
ultra318 FPS
1440p
low476 FPS
medium381 FPS
high318 FPS
ultra238 FPS
4K
low318 FPS
medium254 FPS
high212 FPS
ultra159 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low20 FPS
medium16 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1440p
low15 FPS
medium11 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
4K
low9 FPS
medium6 FPS
high4 FPS
ultra3 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low344 FPS
medium301 FPS
high270 FPS
ultra229 FPS
1440p
low321 FPS
medium287 FPS
high264 FPS
ultra206 FPS
4K
low215 FPS
medium193 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra136 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700M and GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3700M

The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 3029.5%. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
451
14,114+3029%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Turing
Process Node
55 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
240
1920+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS+937%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
80
120+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3700M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
6 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
11 (10_0)
12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (Quadro FX 3700M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
No
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
PureVideo VP2
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 16.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
189W
160W-15%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
—
229mm
Height
—
113mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
72-15%
Perf/Watt
2.4
88.2+3575%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3700MGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
—
$349
Avg Price (30d)
—
$120
Codename
GT200B
TU106
Release
November 11 2008
January 7 2019
Ranking
#815
#168