Quadro FX 3700M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Quadro FX 3700M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Mobility Radeon HD 5650

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 3700M

189

451

+2.3%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Mobility Radeon HD 5650

441

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3700M is positioned at rank 357 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is on rank 590, so the Quadro FX 3700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700M

#342

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

16414%

#357

Quadro FX 3700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

100%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

99%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

98%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

98%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

96%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

90%

#365

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

89%

#366

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

89%

#367

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

88%

#368

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

87%

#369

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

87%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

79%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

76%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 5650

#579

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3693%

#581

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3348%

#582

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3339%

#586

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3036%

#587

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3015%

#589

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

100%

#590

Mobility Radeon HD 5650

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#591

GeForce 510

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

100%

#592

Mobility Radeon HD 3650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

97%

#594

GeForce 9300M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

96%

#595

GeForce 9800 GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $20

96%

#597

GeForce 9100M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

94%

#598

Mobility Radeon X1900

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#599

GeForce 210

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

94%

#600

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

94%

#601

Radeon R7 M365X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

94%

#602

Mobility Radeon HD 5870

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

93%

#603

Radeon R7 M260DX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

93%

#604

Radeon HD 8610G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 3700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 5650.

Insight	Quadro FX 3700M	Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3700M Benchmark Check

Mobility Radeon HD 5650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700M and Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Quadro FX 3700M

The Quadro FX 3700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Mobility Radeon HD 5650

The Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 441 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3700M scores 451 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 reaches 441 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5650). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5650).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Mobility Radeon HD 5650
G3D Mark Score	451+2%	441
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+80%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Mobility Radeon HD 5650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 11.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 5650). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Mobility Radeon HD 5650
DirectX	11 (10_0)	11.0
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	6+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (Quadro FX 3700M) vs UVD 2.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 5650). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3700M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 5650).

Feature	Quadro FX 3700M	Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Encoder	No	UVD 2.3
Decoder	PureVideo VP2	UVD 2.3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3700M draws 189W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5650's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.