Quadro FX 4600 vs GeForce 8800 GTS
Quadro FX 4600
Popular choices:
GeForce 8800 GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4600 is positioned at rank 404 and the GeForce 8800 GTS is on rank 700, so the Quadro FX 4600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800 GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 4600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+139.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8800 GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8800 GTS holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4600 and GeForce 8800 GTS
Quadro FX 4600
The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.
GeForce 8800 GTS
The GeForce 8800 GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 407 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4600 scores 403 and the GeForce 8800 GTS reaches 407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 8800 GTS uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GTS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 403 | 407 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 224+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4600 comes with 768 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GTS has 321 MB. The Quadro FX 4600 offers 139.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.75 GB+140% | 0.313 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4600 draws 150W versus the GeForce 8800 GTS's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8800 GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4600) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GTS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.7 | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 8800 GTS launched at $449 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 8.1 (GeForce 8800 GTS) — the GeForce 8800 GTS offers 0% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4600 | GeForce 8800 GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $449-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #884 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 4600 and GeForce 8800 GTS
