Quadro FX 4600
VS
Quadro FX 1800

Quadro FX 4600 vs Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4600

2008Core: 602 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4600 is positioned at rank 404 and the Quadro FX 1800 is on rank 364, so the Quadro FX 1800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4600

#387
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
73865%
#403
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
100%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
100%
#405
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
90%
#406
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
85%
#408
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
80%
#409
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
80%
#411
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
60%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
50%
#415
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
45%
#416
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
40%
#417
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
40%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800

#349
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18238%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
100%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
99%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
99%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
98%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
96%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
96%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
88%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
84%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
81%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
80%
#374
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
75%
#375
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
75%
#376
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
75%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
74%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
72%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 4600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1800.

InsightQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 4600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+104.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4600 and Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4600

The Quadro FX 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 403 points. Launch price was $1,799.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800

The Quadro FX 1800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4600 scores 403 and the Quadro FX 1800 reaches 395 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1800). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4600) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800).

FeatureQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
G3D Mark Score
403+2%
395
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
192
240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS+35%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
64
80+25%
L2 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 768 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4600) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1800) — the Quadro FX 1800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
VRAM Capacity
0.75 GB
0.75 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4600 draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 1800's 189W — a 23% difference. The Quadro FX 4600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4600) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
TDP
150W-21%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
2.7+29%
2.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 4600 launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro FX 1800 launched at $489 and now averages $100. The Quadro FX 4600 costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Quadro FX 4600) vs 4.0 (Quadro FX 1800) — the Quadro FX 4600 offers 102.5% better value.

FeatureQuadro FX 4600Quadro FX 1800
MSRP
$1999
$489-76%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-50%
$100
Performance per Dollar
8.1+102%
4.0
Codename
GT200B
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#884
#815