
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs GeForce FX 5500

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5500 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2008). The GeForce FX 5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 75% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5500.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+75%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-75%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+1500%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI, it costs 94% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 852.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+852.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and GeForce FX 5500

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce FX 5500
The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the GeForce FX 5500's 8 — the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI leads by 75%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5500 uses Rankine, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14+75% | 8 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1024+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+334% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+1500% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 9.0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the GeForce FX 5500's 25W — a 153.3% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 171mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 25W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 171mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.3+200% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce FX 5500 launched at $37 and now averages $30. The GeForce FX 5500 costs 94% less ($470 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 0.3 (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce FX 5500 offers 100+% better value. The GeForce FX 5500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | GeForce FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $37 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $30-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Codename | GT200B | TU117S |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 17 2021 |
| Ranking | #815 | #468 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















