Quadro FX 500/FX 600 vs GeForce PCX 5300
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Popular choices:
GeForce PCX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is positioned at rank 425 and the GeForce PCX 5300 is on rank 376, so the GeForce PCX 5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 500/FX 600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce PCX 5300 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2008). The GeForce PCX 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5300.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+3100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $15 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 33.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce PCX 5300.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/FX 600 and GeForce PCX 5300
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce PCX 5300
The GeForce PCX 5300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 scores 8 versus the GeForce PCX 5300's 6 — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 leads by 33.3%. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce PCX 5300 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 21,760 (GeForce PCX 5300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5300).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+33% | 6 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 21760+8967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+16746% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 80 | 680+750% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 96 MB+38300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5300 has 128 MB. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 96 MB (GeForce PCX 5300) — the GeForce PCX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+3100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 96 MB+38300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 draws 189W versus the GeForce PCX 5300's 575W — a 101% difference. The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-67% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 500/FX 600 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce PCX 5300 launched at $60 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (Quadro FX 500/FX 600) vs 0.4 (GeForce PCX 5300) — the Quadro FX 500/FX 600 offers 25% better value. The GeForce PCX 5300 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/FX 600 | GeForce PCX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $60-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GT200B | GB202 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #815 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 500/FX 600 and GeForce PCX 5300
