Quadro FX Go1400 vs GeForce 8400M G

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX Go1400 is positioned at rank 349 and the GeForce 8400M G is on rank 635, so the Quadro FX Go1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX Go1400

#334

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

14483%

#349

Quadro FX Go1400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

96%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

95%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

93%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

92%

#355

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

89%

#356

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

89%

#357

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

88%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

87%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

86%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

86%

#362

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

84%

#364

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G

#624

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

5170%

#626

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

4687%

#627

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

4674%

#631

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4250%

#632

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

4221%

#634

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU

MSRP: $899|Avg: $400

100%

#635

GeForce 8400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

100%

#636

GeForce 8400M GS

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

99%

#637

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

99%

#638

GeForce 9100

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

98%

#639

GeForce 8300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#640

GeForce 9600M GT

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

97%

#641

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

95%

#642

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

94%

#643

GeForce 9300GE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

93%

#644

GeForce 9500 GS

MSRP: $110|Avg: $10

93%

#645

Mobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

91%

#646

Mobility Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

90%

#647

GeForce 8500 GT

MSRP: $89|Avg: $15

90%

#648

GeForce 9500 GT

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

90%

#649

Mobility Radeon X1600

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 8400M G is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The GeForce 8400M G likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8400M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX Go1400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX Go1400	GeForce 8400M G
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+3100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8400M G remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX Go1400 Benchmark Check

GeForce 8400M G Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX Go1400 and GeForce 8400M G

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

GeForce 8400M G

The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the GeForce 8400M G reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 8400M G uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M G). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G).

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	GeForce 8400M G
G3D Mark Score	102	105+3%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS+87%
ROPs	24+200%	8
TMUs	64+300%	16
L2 Cache	0.19 MB	1 MB+426%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	GeForce 8400M G
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX Go1400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400M G has 128 MB. The Quadro FX Go1400 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	GeForce 8400M G
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+3100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.19 MB	1 MB+426%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the GeForce 8400M G's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.