Quadro K1000M
VS
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

2013Core: 771 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K1000M is positioned at rank 164 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is on rank 482, so the Quadro K1000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1000M

#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
94%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
93%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
92%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
89%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
88%
#149
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1954%
#164
Quadro K1000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#166
FirePro W5100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
99%
#167
Radeon Pro WX 4170
MSRP: $400|Avg: $120
95%
#168
FirePro W4300
MSRP: $379|Avg: $50
95%
#169
Quadro K2200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
95%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
93%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#176
Radeon Pro 460
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

#472
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2193%
#474
1988%
#475
1983%
#479
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1803%
#480
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1791%
#482
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
99%
#484
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#485
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
97%
#487
97%
#488
96%
#489
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
96%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#491
96%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
#493
95%
#494
95%
#495
91%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K1000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual.

InsightQuadro K1000MRadeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K1000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K1000M and Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

The Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 742 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1000M scores 756 and the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual reaches 742 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K1000M) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual).

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
G3D Mark Score
756+2%
742
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+100%
768

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual has 512 MB. The Quadro K1000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
7.6
14.8+95%