
Quadro K1000M

Radeon R7 A10-7800
Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K1000M
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-7800 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Radeon R7 A10-7800
2024Why buy it
- ✅6.9% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($155 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1000M
The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

Radeon R7 A10-7800
The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K1000M scores 756 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K1000M) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800).
| Feature | Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 756+2% | 740 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.369 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+1414% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K1000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 carries 512 MB. Quadro K1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7800. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K1000M) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K1000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro K1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 7.6+85% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7800 (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K1000M | Radeon R7 A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $155 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #562 | #131 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














