Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7800

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-7800 across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $155 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A10-7800

2024

Why buy it

  • 6.9% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($155 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.9% in average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K1000M instead at 756 vs 740, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A10-7800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A10-7800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 A10-7800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-7800

The Radeon R7 A10-7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 740 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1000M scores 756 and the Radeon R7 A10-7800 reaches 740 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K1000M) vs 3,840 (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7800).

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon R7 A10-7800
G3D Mark Score
756+2%
740
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1536
3840+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS
35.87 TFLOPS+1414%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
128
240+88%
L1 Cache
128 KB
768 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon R7 A10-7800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-7800 carries 512 MB. Quadro K1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-7800. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K1000M) vs 4 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7800) — the Radeon R7 A10-7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon R7 A10-7800
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7800's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro K1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon R7 A10-7800
TDP
100W-44%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
7.6+85%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-7800 (2024 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K1000MRadeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP
$155
Codename
GK104
Navi 32
Release
July 23 2013
September 11 2024
Ranking
#562
#131

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.