Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 75W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275X / M375 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
99.7% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

2014

Why buy it

✅27.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 96.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 202mm, a 201mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌47.1% higher power demand at 75W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2000D instead at 1,600 vs 1,575, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M275X / M375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 96.5% (5.3 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
G3D Mark Score	1,600+2%	1,575
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7327 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+62%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	160 KB+400%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000D has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M275X / M375 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X / M375.

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 38.1% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 202mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
TDP	51W-32%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	202mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	31.4+50%	21.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M275X / M375 was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 96.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275X / M375 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP	$599	$300-50%
Performance per Dollar	2.7	5.3+96%
Codename	GK107	Venus
Release	March 1 2013	January 28 2014
Ranking	#750	#746

Search Quadro K2000D on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M275X / M375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.