
Quadro K2000D

Radeon R9 M370X
Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K2000D
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 75W, a 24W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M370X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌99.7% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M370X
2015Why buy it
- ✅117.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌47.1% higher power demand at 75W vs 51W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,600+2% | 1,570 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000D has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M370X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M370X.
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M370X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 38.1% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W-32% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+50% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M370X was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs 5.2 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the Radeon R9 M370X offers 92.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M370X (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $300-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 5.2+93% |
| Codename | GK107 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #750 | #758 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














