Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

2013Core: 954 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M370X

2015Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 51W instead of 75W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M370X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 99.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M370X

2015

Why buy it

  • 117.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $299 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 95.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 47.1% higher power demand at 75W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M370X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 117.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2000D instead at 1,600 vs 1,570, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M370X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 95.9% (5.2 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M370X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R9 M370X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 M370X

The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
G3D Mark Score
1,600+2%
1,570
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000D has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M370X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M370X.

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M370X). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M370X).

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 38.1% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
TDP
51W-32%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
202mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
31.4+50%
20.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M370X was 49.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs 5.2 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the Radeon R9 M370X offers 92.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M370X (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon R9 M370X
MSRP
$599
$300-50%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
5.2+93%
Codename
GK107
Cape Verde
Release
March 1 2013
May 19 2015
Ranking
#750
#758

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.