Quadro K2100M vs Radeon HD 5770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon HD 5770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon HD 5770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2100M

2013

Why buy it

✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 55W instead of 108W, a 53W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5770

2009

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K2100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌96.4% higher power demand at 108W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K2100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,370 vs 1,348), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon HD 5770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Radeon HD 5770

The Radeon HD 5770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the Radeon HD 5770 reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 5770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 5770). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5770).

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
G3D Mark Score	1,370+2%	1,348
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	576	800+39%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7684 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+77%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	48+20%	40
L1 Cache	48 KB	80 KB+67%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5770.

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
DirectX	12 (11_0)+7%	11.2
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5770).

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	UVD 2.2
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 5770's 108W — a 65% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
TDP	55W-49%	108W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	208mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.9+99%	12.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2100M (2013 vs 2009).

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Radeon HD 5770
MSRP	—	$159
Codename	GK106	Juniper
Release	July 23 2013	October 13 2009
Ranking	#788	#730

Search Quadro K2100M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.