CPU
GPU
Quadro K2100M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2100M is positioned at rank 108 and the Radeon R7 M370 is on rank 354, so the Quadro K2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2100M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M370
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2100M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 M370 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2100M and Radeon R7 M370
Quadro K2100M
The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Radeon R7 M370
The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,370 | 1,418+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+50% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7684 TFLOPS+4% | 0.7373 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 96 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2100M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M370 has 512 MB. The Quadro K2100M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.9+32% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | Radeon R7 M370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $130 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GK106 | Litho |
| Release | July 23 2013 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #788 | #778 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2100M and Radeon R7 M370
