
Iris Plus Graphics 640

Quadro K2100M
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro K2100M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K2100M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

Quadro K2100M
The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the Quadro K2100M reaches 1,370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro K2100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 576 (Quadro K2100M). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,353 | 1,370+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 576+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS+10% | 0.7684 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2100M carries 2 GB. Quadro K2100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the Quadro K2100M's 55W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 350W (Quadro K2100M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-73% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.2+262% | 24.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro K2100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK106 |
| Release | January 3 2017 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #767 | #788 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















