Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

2013Core: 667 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K2100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K2100M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K2100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,370 vs 1,353), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K2100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2100M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the Quadro K2100M reaches 1,370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro K2100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 576 (Quadro K2100M). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
G3D Mark Score
1,353
1,370+1%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm++
28 nm
Shading Units
384
576+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS+10%
0.7684 TFLOPS
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48
48

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2100M carries 2 GB. Quadro K2100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
Encoder
Quick Sync Video
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
Quick Sync Video
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the Quadro K2100M's 55W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 350W (Quadro K2100M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
TDP
15W-73%
55W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
90.2+262%
24.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Quadro K2100M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK106
Release
January 3 2017
July 23 2013
Ranking
#767
#788

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.