Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 5770

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5770

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 5770 Performance Spectrum

Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shared System RAM 15
1,353
+0.4%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
Radeon HD 5770
2 GB 108
1,348
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6800M
brand logoRadeon R7 240
brand logoRadeon R7 250
brand logoRadeon HD 7750M
brand logoRadeon RX 5500M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 5770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 108W, a 93W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5770

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 5770 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌620% higher power demand at 108W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,353 vs 1,348), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 5770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Plus Graphics 640 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon HD 5770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5770

The Radeon HD 5770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the Radeon HD 5770 reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 5770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 800 (Radeon HD 5770). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5770).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
G3D Mark Score
1,353
1,348
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm++
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+20%
40
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5770 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5770 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5770.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
DirectX
12 (12_1)+7%
11.2
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5770).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
Encoder
Quick Sync Video
UVD 2.2
Decoder
Quick Sync Video
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 5770's 108W — a 151.2% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5770). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 208mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
TDP
15W-86%
108W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
450W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
208mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
—
Perf/Watt
90.2+622%
12.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 5770 launched at $159. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 640 was 100+% cheaper ($159 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 8.5 (Radeon HD 5770) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2009).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon HD 5770
MSRP
$0-100%
$159
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
8.5
Codename
Kaby Lake GT3e
Juniper
Release
January 3 2017
October 13 2009
Ranking
#767
#730
Search Iris Plus Graphics 640 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 5770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.