Iris Plus Graphics 640
Tesla M2090
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M2090 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Tesla M2090
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla M2090 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Plus Graphics 640
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.
Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,353 | 1,400+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 1.332 TFLOPS+58% |
| ROPs | 6 | 48+700% |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. Tesla M2090 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | — |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 | CUDA,OpenCL |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 248mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.2+1511% | 5.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 came in at $0, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 640 was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the Iris Plus Graphics 640 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 640 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF110 |
| Release | January 3 2017 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #767 | #530 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Tesla M2090
