Iris Plus Graphics 640
VS
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U.

InsightIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Vega (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses Vega, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 384 (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
G3D Mark Score
1,353
1,348
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Vega
Process Node
14 nm++
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1100 MHz
ROPs
6
8+33%
TMUs
48+100%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
1W
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
90.2
89.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U) — the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U offers NaN% better value. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Kaby Lake GT3e
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
January 3 2017
January 7 2018
Ranking
#767
#831