Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 640

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018

Why buy it

  • Iris Plus Graphics 640 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,353 vs 1,348), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics 640 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 640

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,353 points.

AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 scores 1,353 and the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses Vega, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 384 (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
G3D Mark Score
1,353
1,348
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Vega
Process Node
14 nm++
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1100 MHz
ROPs
6
8+33%
TMUs
48+100%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and System on the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 draws 15W versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
1W
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
90.2
89.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 640 came in at $0, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 640) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U) — the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Kaby Lake GT3e
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
January 3 2017
January 7 2018
Ranking
#767
#831

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.