Quadro K2100M vs Tesla M2090

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2100M vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2100M vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2100M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla M2090 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,400 vs 1,370), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla M2090 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M2090 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2100M vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	1,370	1,400+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	576+13%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7684 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS+73%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	0.05 MB	1 MB+1900%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2100M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. Quadro K2100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2100M) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2090) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	—
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	—
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 127.9% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
TDP	55W-78%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	248mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.9+345%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2100M (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro K2100M	Tesla M2090
MSRP	—	$2500
Codename	GK106	GF110
Release	July 23 2013	July 25 2011
Ranking	#788	#530

Search Quadro K2100M on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.