Quadro K2100M vs GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K2100M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2100M is positioned at rank 108 and the GeForce GTX 275 is on rank 217, so the Quadro K2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2100M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 128.6% more VRAM (2 GB vs 896 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 275.
| Insight | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+128.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2100M and GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K2100M
The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the GeForce GTX 275 reaches 1,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 275 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 275). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,370+2% | 1,349 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+140% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7684 TFLOPS+14% | 0.6739 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 28+75% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2100M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB. The Quadro K2100M offers 128.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2100M) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) — the Quadro K2100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+129% | 0.875 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M) vs 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M) vs No (GeForce GTX 275). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | No |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the GeForce GTX 275's 219W — a 119.7% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 275). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-75% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.9+302% | 6.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2100M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $249 |
| Codename | GK106 | GT200B |
| Release | July 23 2013 | January 15 2009 |
| Ranking | #788 | #789 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2100M and GeForce GTX 275
