
Quadro K2100M vs GeForce MX110

Quadro K2100M
Popular choices:

GeForce MX110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2100M is positioned at rank 108 and the GeForce MX110 is on rank 315, so the Quadro K2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2100M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX110 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2100M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2100M | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX110 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2100M and GeForce MX110

Quadro K2100M
The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

GeForce MX110
The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the GeForce MX110 reaches 1,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the GeForce MX110 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 256 (GeForce MX110). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,370 | 1,415+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+125% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7684 TFLOPS+49% | 0.5151 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+200% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2100M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX110 has 512 MB. The Quadro K2100M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro K2100M) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the GeForce MX110's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 350W (GeForce MX110). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 30W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.9 | 47.2+90% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX110 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2100M | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GK106 | GM108S |
| Release | July 23 2013 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #788 | #781 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












