Quadro K2100M
VS
FirePro W5130M

Quadro K2100M vs FirePro W5130M

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

2013Core: 667 MHz
VS

FirePro W5130M

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2100M is positioned at rank 108 and the FirePro W5130M is on rank 14, so the FirePro W5130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2100M

#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
99%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
97%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
93%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
92%
#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
91%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
90%
#93
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1078%
#108
Quadro K2100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#111
Quadro P520
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#113
Radeon Pro WX 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
95%
#117
Radeon Pro 580X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
92%
#118
Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $45
92%
#119
CMP 40HX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $120
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5130M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
210%
#14
FirePro W5130M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
63%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W5130M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2100M.

InsightQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W5130M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2100M and FirePro W5130M

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

AMD

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the FirePro W5130M reaches 1,408 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the FirePro W5130M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 512 (FirePro W5130M). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M).

FeatureQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
G3D Mark Score
1,370
1,408+3%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
576+13%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7684 TFLOPS
0.9472 TFLOPS+23%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
48 KB
128 KB+167%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2100M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W5130M has 4 GB. The FirePro W5130M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2100M) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W5130M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K2100M) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W5130M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K2100M) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W5130M).

FeatureQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
VCE 2.0
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the FirePro W5130M's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro K2100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 350W (FirePro W5130M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.

FeatureQuadro K2100MFirePro W5130M
TDP
55W-63%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
70-13%
Perf/Watt
24.9+165%
9.4