Quadro K2100M vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

2013Core: 667 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K2100M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

2018

Why buy it

  • 23.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
  • More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2100M instead at 1,370 vs 1,348, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K2100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2100M vs Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2100M

The Quadro K2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $84.95.

AMD

Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U

The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2100M scores 1,370 and the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K2100M) vs 384 (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Raw compute: 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro K2100M) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U).

FeatureQuadro K2100MRadeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
G3D Mark Score
1,370+2%
1,348
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
576+50%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7684 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
48+100%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2100MRadeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2100M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U carries 0 MB. Quadro K2100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2100M and System on the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U.

FeatureQuadro K2100MRadeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2100M draws 55W versus the Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U's 15W — a 114.3% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2100M) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro K2100MRadeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
TDP
55W
15W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
24.9
89.9+261%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K2100MRadeon Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3300U
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK106
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
July 23 2013
January 7 2018
Ranking
#788
#831

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.