Quadro K2200M vs Quadro 7000
Quadro K2200M
Popular choices:
Quadro 7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2200M is positioned at rank 27 and the Quadro 7000 is on rank 398, so the Quadro K2200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 7000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2200M | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200M and Quadro 7000
Quadro K2200M
The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.
Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2200M scores 3,535 and the Quadro 7000 reaches 3,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200M) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,535 | 3,505 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8538 TFLOPS | 1.3322 TFLOPS+56% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2200M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 has 6 GB. The Quadro 7000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200M) vs 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) — the Quadro K2200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2200M draws 65W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 103.3% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200M) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-68% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4+216% | 17.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2200M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $14499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | GM107 | GF110 |
| Release | July 19 2014 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #539 | #541 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2200M and Quadro 7000
