Quadro K2200M vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
Quadro K2200M
Popular choices:
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2200M is positioned at rank 27 and the Arc 8-Core iGPU is on rank 417, so the Quadro K2200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200M
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Arc 8-Core iGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2200M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2200M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc 8-Core iGPU.
| Insight | Quadro K2200M | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K2200M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200M and Arc 8-Core iGPU
Quadro K2200M
The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2200M scores 3,535 and the Arc 8-Core iGPU reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200M is built on Maxwell while the Arc 8-Core iGPU uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200M) vs 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU).
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,535+1% | 3,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+7900% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 1.5 MB+384% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2200M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc 8-Core iGPU has 0 MB. The Quadro K2200M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2200M draws 65W versus the Arc 8-Core iGPU's 45W — a 36.4% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200M) vs 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 45W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 77.8+43% |
Value Analysis
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $503 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $400 |
| Codename | GM107 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | July 19 2014 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #539 | #362 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2200M and Arc 8-Core iGPU
