Quadro K2200M
VS
GeForce GTX 680M SLI

Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

NVIDIA

Quadro K2200M

2014Core: 667 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

2012Core: 720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2200M is positioned at rank 27 and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI is on rank 141, so the Quadro K2200M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200M

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
79%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
75%
#12
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
334%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
70%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
69%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
69%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
69%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
68%
#27
Quadro K2200M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
90%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
83%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
97%
#131
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
304%
#133
276%
#134
275%
#138
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
250%
#139
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
248%
#141
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
98%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2200M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro K2200MGeForce GTX 680M SLI
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2200M and GeForce GTX 680M SLI

NVIDIA

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M SLI

The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2200M scores 3,535 and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI reaches 3,569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 680M SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200M) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI).

FeatureQuadro K2200MGeForce GTX 680M SLI
G3D Mark Score
3,535
3,569
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
2688+320%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2200MGeForce GTX 680M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2200M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 680M SLI has 2 GB. The Quadro K2200M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro K2200MGeForce GTX 680M SLI
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2200M draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 680M SLI's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro K2200MGeForce GTX 680M SLI
TDP
65W-13%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
54.4+14%
47.6