Quadro K2200M vs T400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K2200M vs T400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Quadro K2200M vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K2200M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro K2200M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2200M vs T400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K2200M
The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2200M scores 3,535 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2200M is built on Maxwell while the T400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro K2200M) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400).
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,535 | 3,609+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8538 TFLOPS | 1.094 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 384 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2200M and 64-bit on the T400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K2200M) vs 1 MB (T400) — the Quadro K2200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2200M draws 65W versus the T400's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2200M) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 30W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 54.4 | 120.3+121% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K2200M | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $180 |
| Codename | GM107 | TU117 |
| Release | July 19 2014 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #539 | #532 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2200M and T400
