GeForce RTX 4070 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Arc 8-Core iGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 669.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc 8-Core iGPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+669.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-669.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $400), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 459.4% better value per dollar than the Arc 8-Core iGPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+459.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Arc 8-Core iGPU
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Arc 8-Core iGPU
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2300 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Arc 8-Core iGPU's 3,500 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 669.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc 8-Core iGPU uses Xe LPG, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+669% | 3,500 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+73500% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+8% | 2300 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+287% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc 8-Core iGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc 8-Core iGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc 8-Core iGPU has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (Arc 8-Core iGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc 8-Core iGPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc 8-Core iGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Arc 8-Core iGPU's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Arc 8-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Arc 8-Core iGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+73% | 77.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Arc 8-Core iGPU launched at $503 and now averages $400. The Arc 8-Core iGPU costs 27.3% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8.8 (Arc 8-Core iGPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 455.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Arc 8-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $503-16% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $400-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9+456% | 8.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | April 12 2023 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #32 | #362 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 and Arc 8-Core iGPU
