
Quadro M1200 vs GeForce GTX 470

Quadro M1200
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro M1200 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Quadro M1200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 470 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 220% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 470.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+220%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $349), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 791.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+791.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and GeForce GTX 470

Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

GeForce GTX 470
The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the GeForce GTX 470 reaches 3,145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 470 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 470). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212+2% | 3,145 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+43% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS+28% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB. The Quadro M1200 offers 220% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 470) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+220% | 1.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 470). Vulkan: 1.1 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200) vs None (GeForce GTX 470). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 470).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP8 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 470's 215W — a 130.8% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 93.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-79% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C-12% | 93 |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+389% | 14.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 470 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The Quadro M1200 costs 88.5% less ($309 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Quadro M1200) vs 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) — the Quadro M1200 offers 792.2% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-89% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.3+792% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GM107 | GF100 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #567 | #572 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











