Quadro M1200 vs GRID P4-2Q
Quadro M1200
Popular choices:
GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P4-2Q.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $235), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 496.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+496.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($235) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and GRID P4-2Q
Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.
GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212+2% | 3,162 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+245% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-2Q has 2 GB. The Quadro M1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-80% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+406% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID P4-2Q launched at $1500 and now averages $235. The Quadro M1200 costs 83% less ($195 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Quadro M1200) vs 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) — the Quadro M1200 offers 494.8% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-83% | $235 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.3+495% | 13.5 |
| Codename | GM107 | GM204 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #567 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M1200 and GRID P4-2Q
