Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M2000M is positioned at rank #177 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2000M

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

99%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

98%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

94%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

92%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

90%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

89%

#162

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2166%

#177

Quadro M2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

97%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

96%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

94%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

93%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

93%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

92%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

91%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

90%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M2000M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000M scores 3,410 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M2000M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M) vs 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Boost clocks: 1098 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
G3D Mark Score	3,410	3,415
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	1.585 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock	1098 MHz+6%	1033 MHz
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+400%	64 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+426%	0.38 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB. The Quadro M2000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M2000M) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the Quadro M2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+426%	0.38 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Encoder	4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000M draws 55W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 83.6% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000M) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 97°C.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
TDP	55W-59%	134W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-18%	97°C
Perf/Watt	62.0+143%	25.5