Quadro M2000M
VS
GeForce GTX 960M

Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 960M

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1098 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960M

2015Core: 1096 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M2000M is positioned at rank 177 and the GeForce GTX 960M is on rank 35, so the GeForce GTX 960M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2000M

#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
99%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
98%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
94%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
92%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
90%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
89%
#162
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2166%
#177
Quadro M2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
97%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
96%
#183
Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200
94%
#184
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
93%
#185
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
93%
#186
Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
92%
#188
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
91%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
90%
#191
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 960M

#25
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
161%
#27
146%
#28
145%
#32
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
132%
#33
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
131%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#37
98%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
88%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
87%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
87%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M2000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 960M.

InsightQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M2000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000M and GeForce GTX 960M

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960M

The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000M scores 3,410 and the GeForce GTX 960M reaches 3,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 960M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M2000M) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 960M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M) vs 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M). Boost clocks: 1098 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
G3D Mark Score
3,410+1%
3,375
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
1.505 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1176 MHz+7%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (1st Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 960M).

FeatureQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
Encoder
4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
NVENC (4th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
NVDEC (1st Gen)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000M draws 55W versus the GeForce GTX 960M's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 960M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 82.

FeatureQuadro M2000MGeForce GTX 960M
TDP
55W-27%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-2%
82
Perf/Watt
62.0+38%
45.0