
Quadro M600M vs FirePro D500

Quadro M600M
Popular choices:

FirePro D500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M600M is positioned at rank 25 and the FirePro D500 is on rank 226, so the Quadro M600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro D500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M600M.
| Insight | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro D500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M600M and FirePro D500

Quadro M600M
The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

FirePro D500
The FirePro D500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,272 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the FirePro D500 reaches 2,272 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the FirePro D500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 1,536 (FirePro D500). Raw compute: 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M) vs 2.227 TFLOPS (FirePro D500).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,221 | 2,272+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6728 TFLOPS | 2.227 TFLOPS+231% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M600M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro D500 has 4 GB. The FirePro D500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M600M) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro D500) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12 (FirePro D500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro D500). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro D500).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the FirePro D500's 274W — a 160.5% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 350W (FirePro D500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-89% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.0+792% | 8.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M600M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | GM107 | Tahiti |
| Release | August 18 2015 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #658 | #484 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















