Quadro M600M vs GeForce MX150
Quadro M600M
Popular choices:
GeForce MX150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M600M is positioned at rank 25 and the GeForce MX150 is on rank 304, so the Quadro M600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M600M.
| Insight | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M600M and GeForce MX150
Quadro M600M
The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
GeForce MX150
The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the GeForce MX150 reaches 2,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce MX150 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 384 (GeForce MX150). Raw compute: 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,221 | 2,252+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6728 TFLOPS | 0.7972 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1038 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 144 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M600M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs No (GeForce MX150). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 (GeForce MX150).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th Gen | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the GeForce MX150's 10W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 350W (GeForce MX150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 10W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.0 | 225.2+204% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | GM107 | GP108 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #658 | #657 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M600M and GeForce MX150
