CPU
GPU
Quadro M600M
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M600M is positioned at rank #25 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M600M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U.
| Insight | Quadro M600M | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M600M and Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
Quadro M600M
The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,219 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U reaches 2,219 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 2,304 (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U). Raw compute: 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,221 | 2,219 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2304+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6728 TFLOPS | 7.949 TFLOPS+1081% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1725 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 16 | 144+800% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M600M | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M600M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U's 180W — a 142.9% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-83% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 74.0+502% | 12.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $450 |
| Codename | GM107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #658 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M600M and Radeon Ryzen 7 5700U
