Quadro K3100M vs Quadro M600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K3100M better than Quadro M600M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,283 vs 2,221 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro K3100M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K3100M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro K3100M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro K3100M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro K3100M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M600M is the newer 2015 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (30W vs 75W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro M600M make more sense than Quadro K3100M?

Yes. Quadro M600M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (30W vs 75W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K3100M. The trade-off is that Quadro K3100M currently gives you 2.8% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K3100M Benchmark Check

Quadro M600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
1080p
low	99 FPS	15 FPS
medium	82 FPS	9 FPS
high	68 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	9 FPS
medium	62 FPS	5 FPS
high	51 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	4 FPS
medium	26 FPS	2 FPS
high	17 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	1 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Quadro M600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
1080p
low	72 FPS	66 FPS
medium	48 FPS	37 FPS
high	35 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	17 FPS
1440p
low	39 FPS	19 FPS
medium	22 FPS	12 FPS
high	16 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	14 FPS	6 FPS
medium	8 FPS	4 FPS
high	7 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	2 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Quadro M600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
1080p
low	103 FPS	100 FPS
medium	82 FPS	80 FPS
high	68 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	75 FPS
medium	62 FPS	60 FPS
high	51 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	50 FPS
medium	41 FPS	40 FPS
high	34 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	25 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Quadro M600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
1080p
low	103 FPS	85 FPS
medium	82 FPS	68 FPS
high	68 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	15 FPS
medium	62 FPS	12 FPS
high	51 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	51 FPS	11 FPS
medium	41 FPS	8 FPS
high	34 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	5 FPS

Open Quadro K3100M Open Quadro M600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K3100M and Quadro M600M

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3100M scores 2,283 and the Quadro M600M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3100M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M600M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K3100M) vs 384 (Quadro M600M). Raw compute: 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M) vs 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M).

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
G3D Mark Score	2,283+3%	2,221
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+100%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.084 TFLOPS+61%	0.6728 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+300%	16
L1 Cache	64 KB	128 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M600M has 2 GB. The Quadro K3100M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K3100M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M600M) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Quadro M600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3100M draws 75W versus the Quadro M600M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3100M) vs 350W (Quadro M600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.