GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro M600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro M600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro M600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅79.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 768 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 768 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 768 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 79.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (2,275 vs 2,221), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro M600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460

The GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,275 points. Launch price was $229.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 scores 2,275 and the Quadro M600M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 is built on Fermi while the Quadro M600M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460) vs 384 (Quadro M600M). Raw compute: 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460) vs 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro M600M
G3D Mark Score	2,275+2%	2,221
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	384+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9072 TFLOPS+35%	0.6728 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+250%	16
L1 Cache	448 KB+250%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro M600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 has 768 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M600M carries 2 GB. Quadro M600M gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 and 64-bit on the Quadro M600M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460) vs 2 MB (Quadro M600M) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro M600M
VRAM Capacity	0.75 GB	2 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 460) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro M600M
Encoder	—	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	—	PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs	H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 draws 160W versus the Quadro M600M's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460) vs 350W (Quadro M600M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro M600M
TDP	160W	30W-81%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	14.2	74.0+421%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M600M (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460	Quadro M600M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF104	GM107
Release	July 12 2010	August 18 2015
Ranking	#652	#658

Search GeForce GTX 460 on Amazon

Search Quadro M600M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.