Quadro M600M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅19.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Quadro M600M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M600M instead at 2,221 vs 2,209, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,221	2,209
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6728 TFLOPS	1.385 TFLOPS+106%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	32+100%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M600M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M600M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M600M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	NVENC 4th Gen	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 73.7% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	30W-54%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C-9%	82°C
Perf/Watt	74.0+118%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GM107	Polaris 23
Release	August 18 2015	July 2 2019
Ranking	#658	#659

Search Quadro M600M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.