Quadro NVS 110M vs GeForce FX 5900XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro NVS 110M is positioned at rank #221 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 110M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

92%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

90%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

87%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

87%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

85%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

79%

#206

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3078%

#221

Quadro NVS 110M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

100%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

99%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

94%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro NVS 110M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900XT.

Insight	Quadro NVS 110M	GeForce FX 5900XT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+20%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-20%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro NVS 110M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro NVS 110M Benchmark Check

GeForce FX 5900XT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 110M and GeForce FX 5900XT

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

GeForce FX 5900XT

The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 40 — the Quadro NVS 110M leads by 20%. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5900XT uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	GeForce FX 5900XT
G3D Mark Score	48+20%	40
Architecture	Kepler	Rankine
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1024 ×2+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS ×2+129%
ROPs	16	48 ×2+200%
TMUs	32	64 ×2+100%
L1 Cache	0.03 MB	1 MB+3233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	GeForce FX 5900XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 110M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5900XT has 128 MB. The Quadro NVS 110M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	GeForce FX 5900XT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 365W — a 156.1% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.