Quadro NVS 110M vs GeForce FX Go5700
Quadro NVS 110M
Popular choices:
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro NVS 110M is positioned at rank 221 and the GeForce FX Go5700 is on rank 296, so the Quadro NVS 110M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 110M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX Go5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro NVS 110M.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 110M | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX Go5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 110M and GeForce FX Go5700
Quadro NVS 110M
The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 51 — the GeForce FX Go5700 leads by 6.3%. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX Go5700 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 480 (GeForce FX Go5700). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 110M | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 48 | 51+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5422 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+159% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 32 | 60+88% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 960 KB+2900% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 110M | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 110M | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 219W — a 131.8% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 110M | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-79% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+450% | 0.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro NVS 110M and GeForce FX Go5700
