
Quadro P3000 (móvel) vs Tesla M6

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 135 and the Tesla M6 is on rank 188, so the Quadro P3000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M6
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M6.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M6 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M6 holds the technical lead. Priced at $84 (vs $200), it costs 58% less, resulting in a 132.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+132.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($84) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and Tesla M6

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,385+3% | 6,225 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.11 TFLOPS | 3.625 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1215 MHz+3% | 1180 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 576 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 85.1+37% | 62.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000 and now averages $84. The Tesla M6 costs 58% less ($116 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.9 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 74.1 (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 offers 132.3% better value. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600-40% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $84-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.9 | 74.1+132% |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #380 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















