Quadro P3200 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P3200 is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3200.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $400 for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 518.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+518.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($63) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,578 | 8,811+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 5760 ×2+221% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+10% | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1543 MHz+76% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 ×2 |
| TMUs | 112 | 240 ×2+114% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+180% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit x2.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit x2+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-80% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 114.4+387% | 23.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $63, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 and now averages $400. The Quadro P3200 costs 84.3% less ($337 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the Quadro P3200 offers 519.1% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-83% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $63-84% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.2+519% | 22.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK110B |
| Release | February 21 2018 | May 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #304 | #300 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3200 and GeForce GTX TITAN Z
