
Quadro P3200 vs Radeon RX 580

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P3200 is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3200.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $59 versus $63 for the Quadro P3200, it costs 6% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 9.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($63) | ✅More affordable ($59) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 and Radeon RX 580

Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Radeon RX 580 reaches 8,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,578 | 8,799+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 6.175 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1543 MHz+15% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+17% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 84.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-59% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 114.4+140% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $63, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229 and now averages $59. The Radeon RX 580 costs 6.3% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 149.1 (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 9.5% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $229-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $63 | $59-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.2 | 149.1+9% |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #304 | #301 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















