Quadro P3200 vs Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3200 is positioned at rank 86 and the Quadro P5000 (móvel) is on rank 242, so the Quadro P3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3200.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $400 for the Quadro P5000 (móvel), it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 505.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+505.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($63) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 and Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Quadro P5000 (móvel) reaches 9,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,578 | 9,000+5% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 6.48 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1543 MHz | 1582 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | 768 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 114.4+27% | 90.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $63, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499 and now averages $400. The Quadro P3200 costs 84.3% less ($337 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 22.5 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P3200 offers 505.3% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-80% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $63-84% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.2+505% | 22.5 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #304 | #235 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3200 and Quadro P5000 (móvel)
