Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X

CPU

GPU

Quadro P3200

2018Core: 1328 MHzBoost: 1543 MHz

Similar parts

·····

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X Performance Spectrum

Quadro P3200

4 GB 75

8,578

+2.4%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce MX570

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

TITAN V

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

4 GB 275

8,380

0.0%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

Radeon RX 7800 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3200

2018

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Radeon R9 290X / 390X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
9.8% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (8,578 vs 8,380), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $549, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12.4% (17.2 vs 15.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 290X / 390X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P3200

The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Radeon R9 290X / 390X reaches 8,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
G3D Mark Score	8,578+2%	8,380
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792	2816+57%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.53 TFLOPS	5.914 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1543 MHz+47%	1050 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	176+57%
L1 Cache	672 KB	704 KB+5%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290X / 390X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Quadro P3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit	512-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X).

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.265,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 290X / 390X's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 95°C.

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W-33%	750W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	0mm	275mm
Height	0mm	109mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80-16%	95°C
Perf/Watt	114.4+275%	30.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P3200 came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549. On MSRP, Quadro P3200 was 8.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) — the Quadro P3200 offers 12.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P3200 (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro P3200	Radeon R9 290X / 390X
MSRP	$500-9%	$549
Performance per Dollar	17.2+12%	15.3
Codename	GP104	Grenada
Release	February 21 2018	June 18 2015
Ranking	#304	#287

Search Quadro P3200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 290X / 390X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.