CMP 40HX vs Quadro P3200

CMP 40HX

2021Core: 1470 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P3200

2018Core: 1328 MHzBoost: 1543 MHz

CMP 40HX vs Quadro P3200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 40HX vs Quadro P3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 40HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 39.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 146.7% higher power demand at 185W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $199 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 37.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 185W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
CMP 40HX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (8,749 vs 8,578), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 40HX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm, 36 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $199 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 37.1% (17.2 vs 12.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, CMP 40HX has the stronger long-term case.

CMP 40HX vs Quadro P3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

CMP 40HX

The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200

The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Graphics Performance

The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Quadro P3200 reaches 8,578 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1543 MHz.

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
G3D Mark Score
8,749+2%
8,578
Architecture
Turing
Pascal
Process Node
12 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2304+29%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.603 TFLOPS+37%
5.53 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1650 MHz+7%
1543 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144+29%
112
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+248%
0.66 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 256-bit on the Quadro P3200. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
Encoder
No
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
No
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.265,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 84.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
TDP
185W
75W-59%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80
Perf/Watt
47.3
114.4+142%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro P3200 was 28.5% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the Quadro P3200 offers 37.6% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2018).

FeatureCMP 40HXQuadro P3200
MSRP
$699
$500-28%
Performance per Dollar
12.5
17.2+38%
Codename
TU106
GP104
Release
February 25 2021
February 21 2018
Ranking
#302
#304

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.